Naja unter austrimmen kann ich mir jetzt keine 1000 Dinge vorstellen, aber egal...
PMDG 737NGX
-
-
-
Zitat
Overnight tonight we announced the pending release of update SP1c for the NGX product line. This is a maintenance update to improve efficiency, fix a few things we have addressed during the past two months, and prepare the NGX for third party development via our SDK. (SDK will release concurrently with the SP1c update for those interested!)
You can read more about the update in our forum!
Grad auf deren Fb Seite gelesen
-
Hier ein kleines Statement bzgl. des SP1c für die NGX, die Entwicklung für den XPlane ( ) und ob man etwas für P3D entwickelt.
Ich zitiere:
Zitat
Captains-I thought I would give you a quick update on some things that are happening in the background so that you have the "latest and greatest" information.
(Please note: If I fail to cover any specific topic that is of interest to you in this update- it means there is no new information since the last time I mentioned that topic... :Nerd: )
NGX SP1c Update got run over by migrating herd of software:
================================================
As is typical of companies that do what we do- we occasionally upgrade some of the software and tools we use. Since the NGX release in August, we have been quietly upgrading servers, adding functionality and updating the software that we use to run the operation of PMDG. One of those upgrades was scheduled for the end of January and it required taking down the systems we use for code development for a few days. When we scheduled this upgrade a few months ago, we had planned to have the SP1c and SDK already out- but this didn't happen- so the SP1c/SDK release got steamrolled by the server and software migration schedule.We are now working with some new development tools in the background that will ultimately improve our products- but this also means that we have to do a bit more checking and work with SP1c and the SDK to make sure that these changes didn't break anything unexpected. I anticipate this process taking a few days to a few weeks depending upon what we find.
As of today it looks as though we caught/fixed the few items that will be a factor- but we are going to make sure.
ETOPS, Installshield and never going near the pool without a life vest:
=======================================================
In the ETOPS environment, it is critical that you never work on "both sides of the airplane" at the same time. This way, even if you make an error on on engine- you won't have opened up the other engine- and the theory goes that you'll make it to your alternate safely in the event something goes wrong...But rather than take this sage advice, we are throwing caution to the wind- and also went ahead with this week's planned update to Installshield 2012. We've been using a six year old version of Installshield- and the update was long overdue.
This too, was scheduled to take place AFTER the SP1c/SDK update- but since we got run over by the herd of migrating software we figured we might as well go all out...
Converting the NGX installer over is taking a bit of time- but the new version will give us great flexibility and options for installation methods. Once we have the kinks worked out of the installer conversion- we'll be good to go with the SP1c/SDK release!
SDK appears to be finished:
======================
The SDK appears to be finished- and we've had a few folks working with it testing functionality. We corrected a few things that they reported back with- and we feel it is good to go. The SDK is synched to SP1c, so we are goign to hold of pushing it out the door until SP1c also goes out- as you cannot use one without the other.PMDG 777 for FSX:
================
This project is moving ahead quite nicely- and you will see previews late in first quarter. Given that we have historically taken 3 years or more between major product releases- I think you will be quite pleased to see how far along this project is already! More on this later- and no we will not discuss a release date...PMDG Development for XPlane:
=========================
As I mentioned in a previous post, we see PMDG developing on multiple platforms in the future. There are a number of business arguments for why this is a good idea- and it has been part of our long term strategic plan for about the past 18 months. As we transition between the NGX and the 777, we have decided that now is a good time to begin the process of developing our first project for the XPlane series.I have seen/read a bunch of hyperbole on this topic of late- so I wanted to make very clear that yes, PMDG is going to develop a product for Xplane10. It is going to be a conversion of either the BAe JS4100, the NGX or the [secret project: censored].
We are in the process of evaluating which of these projects will be the conversion project- and while we respect that many folks will have opinions on this topic- I want to make clear that our criteria for this selection has everything to do with easing our own learning process, and allowing us to experiment with the new platform, and unit sales/customer desires are secondary and probably tertiary...
We have a fellow who has just joined the team who will be heading up this process for us. We will not be making any announcements about which project gets selected- just in case we change our mind and find it necessary to change direction once the conversion process has begun.
Once we know for certain that the conversion project is going to make it to completion- we'll let you know which airplane will be first to depart in the XPlane product line!
Personally I am quite excited about this process- as I find that Xplane has some features that absolutely tickle the developer in me. From a marketing perspective- Xplane gives me some concern- as any "healthy" platform for PMDG needs to have lots of scenery and airport designers at work- as well as "competing" designers because in order for PMDG to thrive in a marketplace- the marketplace itself needs to be thriving.
PMDG Development for Prepar3d:
===========================
Thanks to some spry folks here in the forum, we have been in dicsussion with Lockheed Martin, Corp. regarding the current state of, and future development plans for the Prepar3d platform. As I stated in a previous post on this topic, we are currently evaluating which "commercially available" platform we are going to be using for our Commercial Solutions Division.I have seen quite a bit of discussion in this forum and others about whether or not Prepar3d is the replacement platform for FSX, etc etc etc. After my discussion with John Nicol at Lockheed Martin, I feel that I have a very clear picture of what LMCorp has planned for Prepar3d, and equally importantly, *what they do NOT have planned.*
From PMDG's perspective, Prepar3d is not going to be a platform into which we push our retail product line. There will never be a consumer version of P3D, and as such it is not reasonable or feasible for us to expect the major market to exist on P3D beyond a small set of folks who don't mind the niche nature and the price tag.
Now- that being said- there are some very serious licensing questions that come up when folks start talking about using our existing retail product line within Prepar3d. These are issues that we are going to be working with Lockheed Martin and the Prepar3d platform to resolve- as there is a significant amount of unwanted legal liability placed on our shoulders if an airline or airline employed pilot decides to place one of our retail products into that platform and use it for any purpose. Our legal counsel has weighed in on this topic already- and I anticipate that we are going to be updating our EULA to prohibit the use of our products within the Prepar3d platform- but I also am willing to bet that in the long term we will wind up altering their function so that you can only use a product in Prepar3d if it has been specifically licensed for use in Prepar3d and in a commercial environment.
I realize this will disappoint some folks- but the hard reality is that we live in a world where lawyers look for any scapegoat they can find when an airplane has an incident. FSX and our retail products are very clear about the limits of their use- and the fact that Lockheed Martin has made retail products compatible with Prepar3d through the implementation of the FSX version of simconnect means that PMDG has to clearly demonstrate that we will not allow our retail products to be used in a non retail environment... I wish it were otherwise- but since we are talking about real-world liability here- we must act very clearly.
(Please- lets not get into a Forum Lawyer debate about EULA's and Liability Mitigation. The only opinions that matter on this topic are the opinions coming from the law firms (yes- plural) that PMDG pays to provide us with guidance on these topics. Thank you for your understanding.)
NGX Backup CD Production:
======================
I almost for forgot this one: Many of you ordered the backup CD for the NGX. Our plan has been to put them into production once we have the SP1 process finished. We didn't really plan on SP1b- and we definitely didn't plan on SP1c... but 1c is the last SP1 update- so they will go into production within days of the SP1c release!Thanks for your patience!
Oh- and did I mention 777 preview coming by end of first quarter this year? Posted Image
-
Hey,
Ich hab zwei Fragen zur NGX.
Wie kann ich die Engine Config von 24/26k auf zum Beispiel 22K ändern?
Das passt nicht mit meinem TO perf Programm zusammen und kommt zu falschen Berechnungen... oOUnd gibt es im Cockpit nicht irgendwo einen "zentralen" Lichtschalter damit es mal richtig hell wird? So als ob man die
Emergency Exit Lights an macht Finde es etwas dunkel in der Nacht.Grüße
-
Zum 1. Punkt. Nein, kann man nicht ändern, anders als bei der iFly ist man bei den 700ern leider auf 24k limitiert, auch wenn die 22k im Charterbereich viel beliebter sind...
Zu Punkt 2, ja das geht. Schau mal im Overhead weit nach hinten. Rechts unter dem IRS Panel gibts so nen Kippschalter denn man in 2 Richtungen kippen kann, dann wirds gleich viel heller -
Auch Dome Light genannt. Im Upper Overhead.
-
Okay Schade... habs gefunden, danke!
-
So ich nochmal wegen den Engines
Gestern in HAJ und STR hats noch gereicht, aber gerade in Hamburg wurde es echt knapp und mir ging fast die Bahn aus Mein TO perf Programm (nicht TOPCAT) spuckt wirklich immer die besten Werte aus und es reicht auch immer. Aber eben für 22k. Selbst Topcat hat nur 22k. Ich hab jetzt, da mein Programm mit Derate 2 18k vorgeschlagen hat, es auf Derate 1 20k beschränkt. Es kamen dann 81,7% N1 raus. In der NGX habe ich dann Derate 2 20k gewählt und mit der SEL passte es gut und ich kam auf 81,7%. JEtzt müsste es doch eigentlich das selbe sein oder? Wenn ich beides mal 81,7% mit 20k habe, oder?
Der hat kaum und ich komm nicht wirklich nach oben. Gibt es da irgendeine Lösung? Was benutzt ihr? ich könnt auch mal versuchen in TOPCAT mal eine stärkere Leistung nehmen aber ich brauch ja irgendeinen Richtwert wie auch immer damit es nicht mal eben super reicht und dann wieder nicht. Habt ihr ne Idee? -
Also ich nutze TOPCAT, damit hat es eigentlich immer gepasst.
Hast du darauf geachtet ob dein Programm mit oder ohne Packs rechnet? Wenn es ohne Packs rechnet und du vergisst sie auszuschalten vor dem TakeOff, dann ist klar das es nicht passt.
Mit TOPCAT bist du jedenfalls immer gut beraten.
-
Ändert nichts daran, dass Topcat das falsche Rating drin hat, Günter
-
Das ist richtig, passen tut es aber dennoch.
-
Ja mag sein. Dennoch geschieht die TO Performanceberechnung auch eher, um dem Grundsatz "as real as it gets" gerecht zu werden und nicht um einen realistischen Takeoff im Sim zu erleben. Es sollte klar sein, dass die uns zur Verfügung stehenden Addons der Genauigkeit eines TO-Performance Programms nicht genügen.
-
Wenn ich die Center Fuel Pumps inflight bei <450kg Inhalt abstelle, habe ich nach einiger Zeit eine Fuel-Imbalance zwischen li. und re. Tank. Es scheint, dass sobald die Flügeltanks eine bestimmte Treibstoffmenge unterschreiten, Sprit aus dem Center in EINEN der beiden Flügeltanks gepumpt wird. Entspricht das der Realität? Das ist ziemlich nervig, da man dann immer mit Crossfeed die Pumps des zu vollen Tanks abstellen muss.
-
Warum fliegst du den Centertank denn nicht ganz leer?
-
Macht die 744 auch so
-
Warum fliegst du den Centertank denn nicht ganz leer?
Macht man nicht. Die Pumpen werden vom Sprit gekühlt. Wenn davon nix mehr da ist, laufen sie heißMacht die 744 auch so
Ja da muss man einfach bei gleicher Spritmenge die äußeren Crossfeeds abstellen, dann bleibt das aus -
Macht man nicht. Die Pumpen werden vom Sprit gekühlt. Wenn davon nix mehr da ist, laufen sie heiß
Wenn nichts mehr drin ist macht man die Pumpen doch aus, wie sollen die dann heiss laufen? Oder versteh ich grad irgendwas falsch. Desweiteren bekommst du die Tanks ja eh nie komplett leer, ein "Sumpf" bleibt immer drin. -
Also zumindest auf Justplanes Lauda Air DVD machen sie es so. Sie warten bis die LOW PRESSURE Leuchten angehen, und schalten sie dann aus. Somit können sie ja dann auch nicht heiß laufen, wenn sie sofort nachdem kein Sprit mehr gepumpt werden kann, abgeschaltet werden...
-
Ja da muss man einfach bei gleicher Spritmenge die äußeren Crossfeeds abstellen, dann bleibt das aus
Schlauberger, das weiß ich auch Nur wenn du mal nen Rest in nem Tank drin hast, wie z.B. den Reserve Tanks, dann wird deren Rest immer umgepumptUnd ja, generell wartet man bis die Anzeige angeht und schaltet dann die Pumpe ab.
-